Some Nigerians have criticised the Federal Government over its decision to borrow money for the construction of coastal highways while many existing roads across the country remain in poor condition.
According to critics, repairing and rehabilitating damaged roads should be given greater priority because millions of Nigerians depend on these routes for daily transportation, agriculture, commerce and other economic activities. They argue that many highways and rural roads have deteriorated to the point where they pose serious risks to motorists and increase the cost of doing business.
Somehow, those expressing these concerns believe that the government should focus first on maintaining critical infrastructure before embarking on new mega projects. They argue that improving existing roads would have a more immediate impact on the lives of ordinary Nigerians and could help reduce accidents, transportation costs and travel time.
Some critics have also questioned the decision to finance large infrastructure projects through additional borrowing, expressing concerns about Nigeria’s growing debt profile and the long-term financial burden on future generations.
Others have alleged that major infrastructure projects often attract greater public scrutiny because of the large sums involved, leading to calls for transparency, accountability and proper oversight in the award and execution of contracts.
Supporters of the coastal highway project, however, argue that it is a long-term investment designed to improve connectivity, promote economic development and stimulate growth along Nigeria’s coastline.
As public debate continues, many Nigerians are calling for prudent management of public funds, improved infrastructure planning and greater accountability in the execution of projects financed through public borrowing.
By Viewers Corner News